Review of PlanetTogether, Advanced Planning and Scheduling Software Vendor

By Léon Levinas-Ménard
Last updated: April, 2025

Go back to Market Research

In today’s rapidly evolving manufacturing landscape, PlanetTogether—founded in 2004 and rooted in decades of academic research—positions itself as a leading APS (advanced planning and scheduling) vendor dedicated to production scheduling, capacity optimization, and comprehensive supply chain planning. The platform is engineered to integrate seamlessly with major ERP, MES, and SCM systems, thereby providing manufacturers with real‐time data synchronization, drag‐and‐drop schedule optimization, and machine learning–driven enhancements for demand forecasting and predictive maintenance. By consolidating complex production constraints and multi-resource environments into a single, robust solution, PlanetTogether enables organizations to achieve improved on-time delivery, reduced changeover times, and enhanced overall operational efficiency.

Introduction

PlanetTogether was established in 2004 with a strong foundation in academic research—particularly from Cornell University—which has informed its technical approach to advanced planning and scheduling. The company offers an integrated platform that emphasizes optimized production schedules, real‑time visibility into inventory and shop floor data, and advanced algorithms designed to reconcile material, labor, and capacity constraints. Its solution, which caters primarily to manufacturers, combines both traditional constraint‐based optimization techniques and emerging machine learning capabilities to deliver actionable insights for dynamic production environments 12.

What Does the PlanetTogether Solution Deliver?

2.1 Production and Capacity Optimization

PlanetTogether’s core deliverable is its APS platform which focuses on:

  • Optimized Production Schedules: The system generates schedules that incorporate material constraints, machine and labor capacities, as well as sequencing rules. It features smart drag‐and‐drop scheduling and handles complex challenges like sequence-dependent changeovers and batch production (Optimize Schedules) 3.
  • Real-Time Visibility: By synchronizing data between production systems and ERP/MES platforms, the solution offers a “360‑degree view” of production and inventory. This integration supports the alignment of production schedules with order and inventory data as detailed on the SAP ERP integration page (SAP ERP Integration) 4.

2.2 Integration with Enterprise Systems

A significant strength of the PlanetTogether platform lies in its seamless integration capabilities:

  • ERP Integration: The solution connects with systems such as SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Dynamics to import master and transactional data.
  • SCM and MES Connectivity: With built-in integrations for platforms like Kinaxis and Aveva, PlanetTogether ensures that real-time shop floor data and supply chain plans remain aligned, a critical aspect for responding to operational disruptions (Kinaxis Integration) 5.

2.3 AI and Machine Learning Enhancements

PlanetTogether leverages its “Copilot” feature to infuse AI and machine learning into production scheduling:

  • Automated Scheduling with ML: Copilot is designed to analyze data from ERP, MES, and IBP systems and autonomously propose optimal schedules.
  • Demand Forecasting and Predictive Maintenance: Various blog posts outline the use of ML to enhance forecasting accuracy, predict equipment failures, and improve inventory optimization (AI in Demand Forecasting, Leveraging AI and ML) 6.

2.4 Scheduling Optimization

The platform’s scheduling optimization capabilities are further bolstered by:

How Does the Solution Work?

3.1 Underlying Algorithms and Architecture

PlanetTogether’s system is built on advanced optimization algorithms capable of handling multi-plant and multi-resource environments. These include constraint-based planning techniques and heuristics derived from academic research. Despite marketing claims of “state-of-the-art” technology, the underlying architecture relies on well-established methods augmented with real-time data processing capabilities (What is APS?) 8.

3.2 Integration and Data Flow

Integration is achieved via:

  • Pre-Built Connectors and Middleware: These enable seamless data exchange with ERP systems (such as SAP) and other enterprise software, ensuring that master and transactional data remain synchronized (SAP ERP Integration) 9.
  • Real-Time Data Synchronization: The platform’s ability to adjust production schedules dynamically based on live data inputs underscores its practical applicability in fast-paced manufacturing settings (Kinaxis Integration) 10.

3.3 Machine Learning Implementation

While PlanetTogether emphasizes its ML-driven Copilot:

  • Transparency of ML Models: The technical details regarding the algorithms and training data remain high-level, with much of the discussion focused on the promise rather than the specifics of the model architecture.
  • Continuous Learning: The system claims to refine its insights over time through continuous adaptation, although independent verification of these improvements has yet to be widely documented (PlanetTogether Copilot) 11.

Skeptical Analysis

4.1 Vendor Claims vs. Technical Evidence

Although PlanetTogether promotes its solution as a groundbreaking APS platform:

  • Much of its functionality—such as drag-and-drop scheduling, constraint-based optimization, and standard ERP integrations—is common in modern APS products.
  • Bold claims regarding AI and ML enhancements are primarily supported by marketing literature rather than detailed technical disclosures (Leveraging AI and ML) 12.

4.2 Integration Challenges and Real-World Efficacy

Despite offering standard connectors for major systems:

  • Achieving seamless real-time data synchronization across diverse platforms remains a complex challenge. The true performance in varied manufacturing environments may depend heavily on the quality of the data and the level of user training.
  • Case studies and testimonials suggest rapid improvements; however, these results might be highly contingent on the specific implementation context (Features Listing) 13.

4.3 State-of-the-Art Comparison

In the broader APS landscape:

  • PlanetTogether appears to deliver a comprehensive suite of functionalities. Nonetheless, many features claimed as “state-of-the-art” often reflect evolutionary improvements rather than a radical departure from established techniques.
  • The integration of AI/ML, while promising, currently leans on existing predictive analytics methodologies rather than introducing entirely novel approaches (Strategic Partnership Announcement) 14.

PlanetTogether vs Lokad

When comparing PlanetTogether with Lokad, several key differences emerge:

• Focus and Scope: PlanetTogether is dedicated primarily to advanced planning and scheduling within manufacturing settings, emphasizing production scheduling, capacity planning, and integration with ERP/MES systems. In contrast, Lokad is centered on quantitative supply chain optimization with capabilities that span demand forecasting, inventory management, production planning, and pricing automation.

• Technical Approach: PlanetTogether relies on established constraint-based optimization techniques augmented by heuristic scheduling and real-time data integration. Lokad, on the other hand, distinguishes itself through the use of a custom domain-specific language (Envision), probabilistic forecasting (often powered by deep learning), and emerging differentiable programming methods to drive prescriptive decisions 1516.

• User Engagement and Customization: PlanetTogether offers a more traditional APS interface with drag‐and‐drop scheduling and pre-built connectors that appeal to manufacturers seeking an out-of-the-box solution. Lokad’s approach is more flexible and requires a higher degree of technical expertise, empowering supply chain scientists to build bespoke optimization models tailored to complex, multi-echelon challenges.

• Deployment and Integration: Both platforms are deployed as SaaS solutions; however, PlanetTogether emphasizes seamless integration with a wide array of ERP and MES systems to provide real‑time production visibility. Lokad’s architecture is built around an internal engine that minimizes external dependencies and leverages cloud scalability to solve large-scale stochastic optimization problems.

These differences illustrate that while both companies aim to elevate supply chain performance through advanced algorithms and automation, their methodologies and target use cases diverge significantly.

Conclusion

PlanetTogether presents a technically robust APS solution designed to optimize production scheduling and supply chain management through a blend of constraint-based algorithms, real-time integration, and machine learning enhancements. Its strengths lie in seamlessly bridging data silos across ERP, MES, and SCM systems and offering practical scheduling tools such as drag‐and‐drop interfaces and what-if analysis. However, as a skeptical observer, one must note that many innovative claims—particularly regarding its AI and ML capabilities—rely on high-level marketing descriptions and require further independent validation. In comparison to platforms like Lokad, which champion highly programmable, data-driven quantitative optimization, PlanetTogether represents a more conventional yet comprehensive APS offering aimed at traditional manufacturing environments. Organizations considering either solution should evaluate their readiness to invest in the technical expertise necessary to maximize these advanced systems’ benefits.

Sources